jueves, diciembre 11, 2008

Una historia que me ha impresionado

Javi anda un tanto enredado con el tema de la creatividad. Leyendo una de mis revistas preferidas he encontrado una historia bastante impresionante que se relaciona con las preocupaciones de Javi. Sin embargo, la especialización termina apareciendo antes de que la historia concluya.

Gilbert Kaplan Desperately seeking Mahler
Nov 27th 2008 From The Economist print edition
He conducts just one symphony, Mahler’s second. But Gilbert Kaplan has radically changed the way Mahler is perceived, both by audiences and other musicians
Tanja Niemann
ONE April Saturday in 1965, an economist at the American Stock Exchange was taken by a friend to an orchestral rehearsal at Carnegie Hall. He watched impassively as Leopold Stokowski, the aged Hollywood maestro who conducted “Fantasia”, stop-started Gustav Mahler’s Symphony No.2 in C minor all afternoon. The economist thought little of it until later that night, when, sleeplessly, he tossed and turned, haunted by the music he had heard. Next morning he bought a ticket and at the concert “just found myself sobbing, absolutely hysterical”.
The young man was about to launch a publishing business and, with it, to define an occupation. With $100,000 borrowed from Gerald Bronfman, a whisky magnate, and $50,000 from banks, friends and his own savings, Gilbert Kaplan, 24 years old, founded Institutional Investor, a monthly magazine that brought together bankers, analysts and money managers. It quickly became an essential means of communication for financiers, attracting 150,000 subscribers in 140 countries. Before the 1960s were over Mr Kaplan was a millionaire and on first-name terms with finance ministers and international bankers.
But Mahler’s symphony would not let him rest. Over the next few years he attended every performance within reach, met his future wife in the adjacent seat at London’s Royal Festival Hall and, as the obsession intensified, took 18 months off work to study the score and discuss it with such leading interpreters as Leonard Bernstein, Sir Georg Solti and Leonard Slatkin. In September 1982, after an International Monetary Fund summit, he put his reputation on the line by conducting the American Symphony Orchestra in a private performance for financiers and politicians at the Lincoln Centre. A former British prime minister, Sir Edward Heath, himself a spare-time conductor, called it “a very remarkable feat”, but that was, if anything, an understatement.
Mahler’s second symphony, known as the “Resurrection” for its rousing choral climax and theological theme, is one of the trickiest works in the repertory, a 90- minute epic involving a huge orchestra, chorus, two vocal soloists and an invisible offstage group of brass and percussion that seldom come in on cue. Discussing the purpose of life on earth, its unwieldiness regularly defeats the best efforts of famous maestros. For a rank amateur to accomplish a performance without breaking down in the vast finale was tantamount to a musical revolution. Privately Mr Kaplan now admits that if the musicians had failed to respond to his beat or the music fell apart (as it sometimes does in the best of hands), his fallback plan was to turn around to the audience and announce: “Ladies and gentlemen, dinner is served.”
His feat, discreet though it was, reverberated throughout the music world. Over the following years Mr Kaplan was invited to conduct flagship ensembles at La Scala in Milan, in Munich and Vienna, to open the prestigious Salzburg festival and to give the work its Chinese premiere in Beijing. His recording, made in Cardiff in 1985, has outsold Bernstein, Pierre Boulez, Claudio Abbado and all other contenders. On December 8th his odyssey reaches an emotional apotheosis when he conducts the work with the New York Philharmonic at the Lincoln Centre’s Avery Fisher Hall 100 years to the night after the composer, with the same orchestra, gave the piece its American premiere.
Pleasing as this symmetry will be to the now-retired publisher, the results of his presumption are far-reaching. Mr Kaplan is acknowledged as the leading technical authority on Mahler’s second symphony, consulted by many professional maestros on matters of detail. He was the first to import television screens and cameras to communicate with the offstage band, a device now in common use.
He owns the composer’s manuscript, acquiring it in 1984 from a Dutch foundation, publishing it in facsimile and obliging Vienna’s Universal Edition to print a corrected new score which is faithful to Mahler’s final amendments. The Vienna Philharmonic gave its first note-perfect performance under Mr Kaplan’s baton and he experienced his deepest satisfaction when the horn section, struggling in a recording session to accommodate the changes, played one passage 11 times in their earnestness to get it right.
Mr Kaplan’s involvement with the second symphony has made it probably the most talked-about of Mahler’s works, diverting public attention away from the morbidity of his last great pieces. The long-standing image of Mahler as a composer of doom has been set aside, in part through Mr Kaplan’s advocacy.
That an unskilled dreamer could teach professionals how to bring off a masterpiece is a fantasy that many share but few presume to achieve. Mr Kaplan, after his first performance, said: “I had a feeling that people in the audience were urging me to fulfil my dream. They were up with me on the podium that night, playing baseball for the Yankees, writing the book they never wrote or getting the girl they never got.”
His has been a triumph of ambition over intractable matter, a fulfilment of Mahler’s faith in Arthur Schopenhauer’s idea that the human will can overcome any force on earth. Or, in more contemporary Obamist rhetoric, Yes We Can.

3 comentarios:

Abel dijo...

Os dejo aquí un comentario un poco menos entusiasta sobre Kaplan:

http://www.filomusica.com/filo45/kaplan.html

De todos modos, la capacidad para dirigir algo tan grande como la 2ª de Mahler proviene sin ninguna duda de un talento descomunal. Por extraño que suene, la emoción extrema que proviene de una orquesta de ese tamaño resulta absolutamente extenuante para quien no tenga una técnica muy sólida y muchísima experiencia.

Para ilustrar esto, recuerdo un ensayo general de un Te Deum de Bruckner en el que el director del coro (alguien con experiencia coral pero no orquestal) fue invitado a dirigir el conjunto de la obra durante unos minutos mientras el director real se alejaba para comprobar cuestiones acústicas del auditorio. Pues bien, tras tres o cuatro minutos de dirección de todos los instrumentistas en su conjunto, al ser relevado de nuevo, el director del coro se bajó de la tarima sudando, jadeando y con temblores en las manos. Absolutamente verídido.

Así que no me quiero ni imaginar lo que supone dirigir la 2ª de Mahler en su totalidad y mantener la integridad física y mental durante los tres o cuatro minutos que dura el finale, donde el tiempo se estira hasta el infinito, la tonalidad de la obra se afianza una y otra vez, el cuerpo suplica una resolución al climax sonoro que no acaba de llegar... El final de dicha obra exige por un lado la frialdad, exactitud y técnica de un robot mientras exige por el otro lado una pasión humana absolutamente desatada (¡el tema de la obra es la resurrección!). ¿Puede existir paradoja mayor en los ámbitos de actuación del ser humano?

PD: Si un mero intérprete de la obra es capaz de suscitar tales elogios y fervores, ¿qué no merece el CREADOR de la obra? Eso sí que es una persona venida de otro planeta.

PD2: Vaya, por un rato olvidé que este blog iba sobre economía...

Carlos Arias dijo...

Muchas gracias por el comentario. Es un lujo contar con un economista músico (o viceversa) entre mis lectores. Este blog va de Economía y de otras cosas. La música podría entrar en otras cosas. Pero no hace falta.
La Economía es la filosofía mundana (Robert L. Heilbroner, The wordly philosophers). Ninguna actividad humana le es ajena si los fines son amplios y los recursos limitados.
Por ejemplo, tener un repertorio de una sinfonía y repetirlo cien veces ayuda a que la cosa funcione bastante bien (especialización y costes fijos).

Javier García dijo...

Vaya la de aplicaciones que tienen estos economistas....igual planchan un huevo que fríen una corbata!

...era broma, estoy de acuerdo en los comentarios. Gracias por tus palabras Abel, a los analfabetos en la materia nos enriquecen!